Apple Sees Self-Driving Car as a Massive AI Project
Apple’s autonomous car project has morphed yet again. This time, it’s being described as a massive exercise in artificial intelligence that concentrates on self-driving. It emerges Apple may be leaving the hardware part – the steel, glass, and rubber car – to others.
The latest information comes from a reliable source, Apple CEO Tim Cook, in a movie interview with Bloomberg TV. Cook called it “the mother of all AI projects … most likely one of the most difficult AI projects to work on.”
Apple is still in the game
Apple’s interest in self-driving has been evident since two thousand fourteen when it launched Project Titan (internal code name) and hired 1,000-plus engineers to work on autonomous-driving technology, and possibly the vehicle, too. Apple evidently planned to farm out the manufacturing work to an existing automaker. Creating a factory from scrape takes time, and often build quality in a fresh factory takes time to improve.
A tour to Europe to talk to BMW and Daimler (Mercedes-Benz) was said to be fruitless. But some accounts, there were concerns over data protection and security of the software. There were also reports egos played a part, and none of the three alpha dogs – Apple, BMW, Daimler – wished to be the underling in the relationship.
In the Bloomberg interview, Cook was asked about Apple’s plan to manufacture a car in collaboration or to sell the software to automakers, like Apple CarPlay, only orders of magnitude more complicated. Cook said, “We’ll see where it takes us. We’re not truly telling from a product point of view what we will do.”
Keying on artificial intelligence
“We’re focusing on autonomous systems,” Cook said. “Clearly one purpose of autonomous systems is self-driving cars. There are others. We sort of see it as the mother of all AI projects. … It’s most likely one of the most difficult AI projects actually to work on.”
Analysts suggest Cook’s careful phrasing means Apple’s AI work might have applicability in other industries beyond cars. Cook noted, “We’re not truly telling from a product point of view what we will do, but we are being straightforward that it’s a core technology that we view as very significant.”
Does this mean Apple won’t build a car?
Apple’s concentrate on the software aspect suggests it’s out of the car-building business, and instead would license its technologies to other automakers. But is it truly? It’s true that building a car involves orders of magnitude more parts than screwing together a PC. But assuming Apple isn’t building a plant from scrape – Tesla’s Fremont, California, factory is actually an old GM/Toyota facility – Apple doesn’t have to cut deals with name automakers.
Apple could turn to Magna Steyr in Austria, which has decades of practice building cars for others and in some cases treating pre-production engineering. Some reports say the big engineering team included a dozen engineers on loan from Magna Steyr.
Steyr presently produces the Mercedes-Benz G-Class (for decades) and the BMW five Series (kicking off in 2017). In two thousand eighteen it will build the Jaguar Land-Rover i-Pace, an EV. In the past, it has built Minis, Aston Martins, Jeeps, and Volkswagens. For those who believe Apple could build its own car via a contract manufacturer, it’s seen as no different from Hon Hai (Foxconn) building Apple’s iPhones.
If Apple is to build a car, it would have to chose gas or electrical. Here’s one hint: Cook said he admires what Tesla has accomplished. “It’s a marvelous practice not to stop at the packing station or the gas station,” Cook said.
Apple investors would have to be patient if Apple builds cars. It took Tesla a decade to become a roaring success and four more years to pass Ford and GM in market value. It is now the fourth most valuable automaker (by market cap), behind only Toyota, Daimler, and VW, and just ahead of BMW.